Comparison8 min read

Playwright vs Selenium vs Puppeteer

Short answer

Playwright is the most complete of the three for new projects: it drives Chromium, Firefox and WebKit from Node.js, Python, Java or .NET, waits for elements by itself and ships a test runner. Selenium implements the W3C WebDriver standard and has the widest reach, 5 core languages, every major browser including Safari, and Selenium Grid for many machines; Puppeteer is the lean Node.js choice for Chrome and Firefox. All three run through ProxyField residential proxies from $1.95/GB; start with the Easy Trial: 1 GB for $2.95.

residential IPs
412M+
from, traffic never expires
$1.95/GB
Easy Trial
1 GB for $2.95
On this page 9 sections
  1. Playwright vs Selenium vs Puppeteer at a glance
  2. How they differ underneath
  3. Is Playwright faster than Selenium?
  4. Languages, browsers and testing
  5. Playwright vs Selenium for web scraping
  6. Proxies in all three
  7. Which should you choose?
  8. Proxies for browser automation
  9. Playwright vs Selenium vs Puppeteer FAQ

Playwright vs Selenium vs Puppeteer at a glance

All three are open source under Apache-2.0. Versions are those current in October 2026: Playwright 1.64.1, Selenium 4.51.0 and Puppeteer 25.16.0 (npm and PyPI registries, Selenium downloads).

FeaturePlaywrightSeleniumPuppeteer
Maintained byMicrosoftThe Selenium project (open source)Google's Chrome team
Since2020 (1.0 in May)20042017 (1.0 in January 2018)
LanguagesJavaScript/TypeScript, Python, Java, .NET (languages)Java, Python, C#, Ruby, JavaScript (core bindings)JavaScript/TypeScript
BrowsersChromium, Firefox, WebKitChrome, Edge, Firefox, SafariChrome, Firefox
ProtocolIts own layer over each engineW3C WebDriver, plus WebDriver BiDi and CDP in Selenium 4CDP for Chrome, WebDriver BiDi for Firefox
WaitingAuto-waits before every actionExplicit or implicit waits you writepage.locator() waits; older code uses waitForSelector()
Test runnerPlaywright Test (built in)None; use JUnit, pytest, NUnit and othersNone; use Jest or Mocha
Parallel and remoteWorkers and sharding in Playwright TestSelenium Grid on many machinesYour own code
RecordercodegenSelenium IDEChrome DevTools Recorder
Best known forModern end-to-end testing and scrapingCross-browser QA in large teamsChrome automation in Node.js

How they differ underneath

Selenium sends each command as an HTTP request to a browser driver (chromedriver, geckodriver, msedgedriver, safaridriver), following the W3C WebDriver Recommendation of June 2018 (W3C). The driver layer is why one Selenium script runs on every browser that ships a driver, and why Selenium works with cloud grids and device farms that speak WebDriver. Selenium 4 adds WebDriver BiDi for network and log events (Selenium BiDi).

Playwright and Puppeteer keep one open connection to the browser and push commands over it. Puppeteer uses the Chrome DevTools Protocol for Chrome and WebDriver BiDi for Firefox. Playwright downloads its own browser builds matched to each release, so a script sees the same Chromium, Firefox and WebKit everywhere. The persistent connection gives both of them event-driven waits and direct network control without a driver in between.

Is Playwright faster than Selenium?

Playwright scripts usually finish sooner, for two reasons: there is no driver hop per command, and auto-waiting acts the moment an element is ready instead of after a fixed pause. Page loads still take most of the time in every tool, so no general speed figure holds; benchmarks you find online measure different pages and setups. Run the same URLs through each tool with the same browser, waits, blocking rules and proxy before you decide on speed.

Languages, browsers and testing

Languages. Selenium has the widest set: Java, Python, C#, Ruby and JavaScript are maintained by the main project, and community bindings exist for more. Playwright has official packages for four languages. Puppeteer is JavaScript only; its Python port is unmaintained.

Browsers. Selenium is the only one of the three that drives real Safari, through Apple's safaridriver. Playwright tests WebKit, the engine behind Safari, on Windows, Linux and macOS, which covers most Safari rendering checks without a Mac. Puppeteer covers Chrome and Firefox.

Testing. Playwright Test bundles a runner, retrying assertions, parallel workers, traces and HTML reports. Selenium plugs into the runner of each language (JUnit, TestNG, pytest, NUnit, RSpec), which suits teams with an existing test stack. Cypress, a JavaScript test tool that runs inside the browser, is the other common choice; it covers Firefox and Chrome-family browsers, including Edge (Cypress docs).

Playwright vs Selenium for web scraping

For scraping, Playwright is the easier start in 2026: auto-waiting removes most timing bugs, page.route() blocks images and fonts to save traffic, page.on('response') captures the JSON a page loads, and the Python and Node.js APIs are nearly identical. Selenium remains a solid choice for teams that already run it, especially in Java or C#, and for jobs that spread hundreds of browsers over Selenium Grid. Puppeteer matches Playwright on Chrome for Node.js scrapers.

The same JavaScript-rendered practice page in Playwright for Python:

Python
# pip install playwright && playwright install chromium
from playwright.sync_api import sync_playwright

with sync_playwright() as p:
    browser = p.chromium.launch()
    page = browser.new_page()
    page.goto("https://quotes.toscrape.com/js/")
    page.locator(".quote").first.wait_for()            # wait until the quotes exist
    texts = page.locator(".quote .text").all_text_contents()
    print(len(texts), texts[0])
    browser.close()

The Selenium and Puppeteer versions of this scraper are in Puppeteer vs Selenium. Whichever tool you pick, check first whether you need a browser at all: if the data sits in the page's HTML or in a JSON request, an HTTP client is faster and uses less traffic (how to scrape hidden APIs and embedded JSON).

Proxies in all three

Every one of them sends traffic through an HTTP, HTTPS or SOCKS5 proxy; only the place for the login differs.

ToolWhere the proxy goesSetup guide
Playwrightproxy={"server": "http://gate.proxyfield.io:7000", "username": "<login>", "password": "<password>"} at launch or per contextPlaywright proxy setup
Selenium (Chrome)--proxy-server flag plus an IP allowlist, an auth extension or Selenium's BiDi auth handler (Python 4.32 and later)Selenium proxy setup
Puppeteer--proxy-server flag plus page.authenticate()Puppeteer proxy setup

With the ProxyField gateway, the username <login>-country-us-city-new_york asks for an exit IP in New York. Region, session and session time go in the same username: -region-<region>, -session-<id> and -ttl-<seconds> (30 to 129,600 seconds, 20 minutes by default), as in <login>-country-us-region-new_york-city-new_york-session-he9f2qga-ttl-600; every part after the login is optional. The gateway gives each request a new IP (rotating), or keeps one IP for a sticky session from 30 s to 36 h.

Which should you choose?

  • Starting a new scraper or test suite in any of its 4 languages: Playwright.
  • Real Safari, Java or C# shops, existing grids and device farms: Selenium.
  • Chrome-only automation in Node.js, PDFs and screenshots: Puppeteer.
  • A working suite in any of them: keep it, and move only for a missing browser, language or feature.

Two-way comparisons: Puppeteer vs Playwright and Puppeteer vs Selenium. Tutorials: web scraping with Playwright, web scraping with Selenium and web scraping with Puppeteer. Newer options, from patched drivers to AI browser agents, are in Puppeteer, Selenium and Playwright alternatives.

Proxies for browser automation

Browser scrapers load whole pages, so they meet rate limits and IP blocks sooner than plain HTTP scrapers. ProxyField gives Playwright, Selenium and Puppeteer a new IP on every request or a sticky session up to 36 h, over HTTP, HTTPS or SOCKS5, with targeting by country, region (state) and city and unlimited concurrent threads. Residential proxies cost $2.95/GB for 1 GB and fall to $1.95/GB from 1,000 GB, with no subscription; traffic never expires, and all purchases are final. Start with residential proxies and the Easy Trial: 1 GB for $2.95.

Playwright vs Selenium vs Puppeteer FAQ

Is Selenium or Playwright better for scraping?

ProxyField residential proxies cost $2.95/GB at 1 GB, down to $1.95/GB from 1,000 GB, and work with both tools. For most new scrapers Playwright is the better fit: auto-waiting, request blocking and response capture are built in, and the Python and Node.js APIs match. Selenium is fine when your team already runs it, writes Java or C#, or needs many browsers through Selenium Grid.

What's the difference between Selenium and Playwright?

Selenium sends W3C WebDriver commands through a separate driver for each browser and has core bindings in 5 languages; Playwright keeps one connection to its own Chromium, Firefox and WebKit builds and supports 4 languages. Playwright adds auto-waiting and a built-in test runner, while Selenium adds real Safari and Selenium Grid.

Is Playwright faster than Selenium?

Usually, yes: Playwright has no driver hop per command and acts as soon as an element is ready. Page loads dominate run time in both, so measure your own pages with the same browser, waits and proxy rather than trusting a general figure.

Playwright vs. Selenium: which is best?

ProxyField residential proxies cost $2.95/GB at 1 GB, down to $1.95/GB from 1,000 GB, and work with both tools. Neither is best for every job: many new projects start with Playwright, but Selenium is still actively developed, with version 4.51.0 shipped on October 9, 2026 for all 5 core languages. Large QA teams with Selenium suites and grids keep them, so both will be around for years.

Which is best for end-to-end testing: Playwright, Selenium or Puppeteer?

ProxyField residential proxies cost $2.95/GB at 1 GB, down to $1.95/GB from 1,000 GB, and work with all three. For end-to-end testing of most web apps, Playwright fits first: Playwright Test bundles the runner, retrying assertions, traces and parallel workers across Chromium, Firefox and WebKit. Selenium wins when you must test real Safari or reuse an existing grid, and Puppeteer has no test runner, so it suits automation more than test suites.

Playwright vs Selenium: which one offers easier proxy setup?

Playwright. It takes the server, username and password in one proxy option, per browser or per context; Selenium with Chrome takes the server in --proxy-server and needs an IP allowlist, an auth extension or Selenium's BiDi auth handler (Python 4.32 and later) for the login.

Do Playwright and Selenium work with proxies?

Yes. Both send the browser's traffic through an HTTP proxy that you set at launch, so every page, script and image the browser loads goes through it and counts toward your traffic. With ProxyField a rotating gateway gives a new IP on every request and a sticky session keeps one IP for 30 seconds to 36 hours. Playwright takes the proxy login in its proxy option, while Selenium with Chrome needs an extra step for it.

How do Playwright, Selenium and Cypress compare?

Playwright and Selenium control the browser from outside and support several languages; Cypress runs JavaScript tests inside the browser and covers Firefox and Chrome-family browsers, including Edge. Cypress is a testing tool, while Playwright and Selenium also serve scraping and general automation.

Which languages do Playwright, Selenium and Puppeteer support?

Selenium has core bindings for Java, Python, C#, Ruby and JavaScript. Playwright supports JavaScript and TypeScript, Python, Java and .NET. Puppeteer supports JavaScript and TypeScript on Node.js only.

Can Playwright connect to Selenium Grid?

Yes, as an experimental feature: Playwright can launch Chrome or Edge on a Selenium 4 Grid hub when you set the SELENIUM_REMOTE_URL environment variable. Playwright's docs warn that it relies on a CDP endpoint Selenium exposes today and may break in the future.

Show 1 more questionShow fewer questions

Which is better overall: Playwright, Puppeteer or Selenium?

It depends on the job, not on a single ranking. Playwright is the default for new scrapers and test suites, Selenium for real Safari, Java or C# teams and existing grids, and Puppeteer for Chrome automation in Node.js. All three render JavaScript and work behind the same rotating proxy.

Easy Trial: 1 GB for $2.95.

Try for the price of 1 GB, no subscription, traffic never expires.